• Requests Bianco's current state of the world and top-line macro view.
    Jeremy Schwartz
  • Jim Bianco
    Inflation is elevated (~2.93% core), not near Fed target, and will take time. Real economy question is labor market. Job creation has slowed dramatically, but needed job growth may be only ~25k/month due to collapsed immigration (CBO estimate fell from 2.7M to 48k). This means weak job numbers might be 'okay' given new demographic reality. Risk is Fed cuts too aggressively, re-sparking inflation.
  • Asks about AI impact on productivity and potential for layoffs.
    Jeremy Schwartz
  • Jim Bianco
    AI data center buildout adds 1.25-1.5% to GDP now ($1T+ capex). Long-term, AI will follow Bill Gates' internet rule: underdeliver 1-3 years, overdeliver 10 years. Immediate productivity gain is in coding. Long-run, tech advances are net job creators, but new jobs are in industries that don't exist yet (like internet created).
  • Asks how to balance sticky inflation thesis with AI's deflationary productivity gains.
    Jeremy Schwartz
  • Jim Bianco
    AI will become a deflationary pull several years from now as it becomes ubiquitous. Current sticky inflation (~3%) is due to post-COVID structural changes: remote work (up from 7% to 27% of workforce), deglobalization/segmentation, and reversed immigration patterns globally. These offset prior tech efficiencies.
  • Asks about Fed dissent (Stephen Moore) and groupthink.
    Jeremy Schwartz
  • Jim Bianco
    Defends Moore for providing heterodox views, breaking Fed groupthink. Criticizes NY Fed's John Williams for singling out Moore. Highlights Fed's lack of accountability, citing 2019 op-ed by Bill Dudley suggesting Fed could tank economy to affect election, and Lael Brainard's 2016 donations to Clinton while arguing against rate hikes.
  • Asks about Fed independence and risks of political control.
    Jeremy Schwartz
  • Jim Bianco
    Independence is a continuum. Risk is pendulum swings too far: from Brainard's alleged conflict to Trump's desire for aggressive cuts to lower debt costs (fiscal dominance). If Fed cuts to 1% for fiscal reasons, it could never raise again without triggering market vigilantes.
  • Asks about yield curve normalization (reference to 'Seagull' view that Fed funds should be 100bps below 10-year).
    Jeremy Schwartz
  • Jim Bianco
    Agrees managed rates reduce informational value. Yield curve was perfect pre-COVID indicator but hasn't predicted post-2020 recession due to being 'overly managed.' Historically, 2s10s spread is ~100bps. Argues short-term rates (~4%) are about right (neutral-ish), but long-term rates are too low and should go up.
  • Asks about Bianco's bond index positioning and rationale.
    Jeremy Schwartz
  • Jim Bianco
    Index is short duration (90% of benchmark), bulleted in 5-10y sector (curve steepener), underweight corporates (spreads at generational tights), overweight mortgages, with conviction bets in local EM debt (6.8% yield) and short-term TIPS. Expects long-term rates to rise, short-term rates held steady by Fed cuts, curve to steepen.
  • Asks about his '4-5-6' return framework (cash-bonds-stocks).
    Jeremy Schwartz
  • Jim Bianco
    Maintains 4% cash, 5% bonds, 6% stocks forward return expectation. Stock market's 14% YTD gain is 70% from 41 AI stocks; other 459 stocks are near 6%. AI stocks are 47% of S&P, merging S&P and NDX composition. High valuations mean market likely disappoints over medium term, averaging 6%.
  • Asks if AI is a bubble and parallels to 2000.
    Jeremy Schwartz
  • Jim Bianco
    AI bubble parallels 2000 internet: not that valuations are universally insane (some are), but market prices every AI stock as a winner. Not all can win. When bubble pops, losers drop 80-90%, winners don't rise much further.
© 2025 - marketGuide.cc

We tailor state-of-the-art business-driven information technology.

bitMinistry