President Trump wants a peace agreement with Iran signed today, but Tehran gives a different timeline. G7 leaders head to the French Alps for the annual summit where Iran is a dominant topic, along with European security, inflationary pressures, and shaken oil markets from the war in the Middle East.

We're hearing different things from different folks on this timeline. I'm wondering what you are hearing from the Iranians and the Middle East. I've heard that folks from other regional allies are heading to Europe to help facilitate this, but the president is vehemently tweeting this is happening today, while Tehran says not so fast. Where is the truth?

We headed into the weekend with positive sentiment thinking this deal would be signed, but now we're back to conflicting statements. A Reuters report suggests Iran is looking at an MoU that involves diluting highly enriched uranium within Iran in exchange for $25 billion of frozen assets. We haven't heard from the American side yet.

From the Gulf, we know a Qatari team went to Tehran today to mend differences. Qatar has emerged as a key mediator alongside Pakistan. We thought by Sunday we'd have clarity, but it might be delayed. The Strait of Hormuz remains effectively shut—President Trump says it will open when the deal is signed, but Iran has mined the strait and wants management over it once open. Concessions are not being met by either side.

Let's go to Josh Wingrove in Geneva. How large does the Iran conflict loom over the G7 discussions, and what meetings does President Trump have planned on the sidelines with non-G7 leaders?

Up until yesterday, there was speculation a deal was at hand with a signing ceremony in Geneva. I flew in and saw four US Army helicopters and a large transport plane, setting the scene for a large presence. But the on-off nature of the deal makes it hard to predict. The peace talks have dominated what would otherwise be a G7 meeting about global cooperation. President Macron is also convening Gulf leaders here, so it's not business as usual.

We've got messaging from the White House about NATO troops being pulled back and possibly taking jets out of the region, impacting readiness. How are leaders approaching this? Is there a united front, and what are the odds of convincing the US to stay in NATO?

NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte's approach of buttering up the US president was initially thought successful, but one by one, US leaders have said no—starting with Keir Starmer, then President Merz in Germany. That unified front of going along with Trump to keep him onside has been undone, because even doing that doesn't guarantee results. The major plans to pull US fighter jets out of Europe show appeasement hasn't worked. So we'll see a less than united front, and the communique will be closely parsed for signs the coalition has fallen apart.

President Trump's distaste for the JCPOA is evident. He tweeted that this deal is not that—his deal is not a smooth road to a nuclear weapon. How large is the historical resonance? Are Middle East leaders trying to avoid something like the JCPOA as assiduously as Trump?

The current MoU's 14 provisions leaked by semi-official Iranian media suggest many concessions play into Iran's favor. Trump wants Iran to never get a nuclear weapon, but Iran has always maintained it wasn't seeking one—a fatwa from the late supreme leader may or may not still apply. The other US win would be opening the Strait of Hormuz, but it was largely open before the conflict started in late February.

Some European leaders, including Merz of Germany, have said Trump is being played by Iranian negotiators. Those comments hang over the summit. Who is the president meeting with and not meeting with? He's having bilats with some but not with significant figures like Netanyahu and Zelensky—they're having a working group, not one-on-ones.

The final agenda is fluid because everything will be overshadowed by a deal or failure to get one. If he has a deal, he'll want to trumpet it, and some bilaterals may be set aside. He doesn't take well to criticism from Merz, so those comments about him being played may lead to a snub. As the leader of the most powerful economy and military, he has that prerogative.

There is news that the former Supreme Leader of Iran is likely to be buried next week. Where has the body been, and is it significant that the regime feels comfortable holding such a ceremony?

The burial is set for next week. The Iranian regime keeps details secretive, just like the location of current Supreme Leader Khamenei since the war started in late February. Previously, such funerals brought in millions of people, but we don't know how it will take shape under current circumstances.