Ruchir Sharma argues that current market highs are artificially supported by a 6% fiscal deficit, which inflates corporate profits. He warns that higher bond yields could trigger a reversal, as they have ended every bubble for 300 years. He advises staying invested but buying ignored, cheap quality companies globally, as the AI momentum could continue like late 1999.
Introduces Ruchir Sharma and his FT piece arguing that the American profit machine is misrepresented, despite companies making money unlike the dot-com bubble.
Andrew
Ruchir Sharma
Three factors misrepresent profits: 1) A 6% fiscal deficit artificially boosts corporate profits via income transfer. 2) Tech earnings growth in the late 90s was also 20%, similar to now. 3) Private markets now hide loss-making companies that later come public.
The mirror image of a large fiscal deficit is high corporate savings, artificially boosting profits.
Asks when the end might come, noting that higher interest rates break business models reliant on 0% financing.
Andrew
Ruchir Sharma
Every bubble for 300 years has ended with higher interest rates. The trigger will likely be bond yields near 5% on the 10-year, forcing the government to tighten, reducing artificially boosted corporate profits.
The market doesn't like bond yields close to 5%.
Notes that NVIDIA's forward PE of 23 is not insane, questioning comparisons to 1999-2000.
Andrew
Ruchir Sharma
Valuations are not near 1999-2000, but earnings could be in a bubble due to artificial inflation from the deficit. Earnings growth is similar to the late 90s, and including private companies changes the picture.
In the late 90s, the government barely ran a deficit; now it's 6% of GDP in a full expansion.
Asks how quickly private companies like SpaceX will show profits.
Andrew
Ruchir Sharma
SpaceX is unlikely to be profitable soon. Momentum can continue until higher interest rates hit, as there's no science to predict bubble endings.
Companies like Anthropic are surprising on the upside, keeping momentum going.
Asks for actionable advice: stop investing, sell, or stay invested despite the risk of being wrong on timing.
Andrew
Ruchir Sharma
Advises staying invested for the next year or two as smart hedge funds do, but also buy ignored, cheap quality companies globally—'the opposite of love is not hate, it's indifference.'
This could still be October 1999 rather than March 2000, and the Nasdaq doubled in that period.